Bezos Rolls Out Amazon Voting Systems For 2020 & New ACT Allows Banks To Fund Medical Marijuana
Via America’s Lawyer: Mike Papantonio and Trial Lawyer Magazine editor Farron Cousins dive into tech behemoth Amazon’s new foray into the election systems of over 40 states across the U.S, further widening Jeff Bezos’s grip on modern society. Then, Mike Papantonio is joined by legal journalist Mollye Barrows to talk about the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act just passed by the House of Representatives. As legislation moves onward to the Senate, this bill would protect from prosecution those banks that do business with the cannabis industry.
————-
Transcript:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Mike Papantonio: If the thought of Jeff Bezos running our election system in America scares the bejesus out of you, you’re not alone. According to new reports, Amazon has now taken over most of our voting systems. I have Farron Cousins from the trial lawyer magazine with me now to explain what’s happening. Farron, you’ve been on this Amazon case for years, warning us about how dangerous this is, when we have an entity where there are no antitrust laws that seem to be able to close them down. There’s no regulations that close them down or keep them from expanding into all parts of our lives. And now this is pretty scary stuff. Now, now they’re messing with our right to vote. Tell me, lay this story, lay this story out for me a little bit.
Farron Cousins: Well, what’s happening right now is apparently over the last couple of years, and this has been done relatively quietly, Amazon, Amazon web services, AWS they call it, they have absolutely taken over 40 different State’s voting security. Which means not only do they, how’s the results on election night, they, how’s the voting roles, the voter registration information, everything in any given one of those 40 States that has to do with the voters. Everything from the results to the registrations and anything in between. So Amazon itself, Jeff Bezos, CEO, is sitting there on our, all of our information, including the results of federal, national, state, and local elections.
Mike Papantonio: Okay. Let, let me remind you about a story that we did. It was on Capital One where the system was hacked and I don’t, I don’t remember exactly the numbers is some like 100 million people were affected by that hack. This was part of the Amazon program too.
Farron Cousins: Right.
Mike Papantonio: Okay. So somebody, and this was a rogue employee. Now, so here you have, everything’s in the cloud and right now, I think my, I think the numbers like they can, they control almost 35% of all the cloud computing business right now. So now they’re moving into elections. We know that they’ve failed miserably, not just one time, but a couple of times, failed miserably, and now we’re saying we want you to keep up with all this information about voting.
Farron Cousins: And what’s really suspicious about this to me is the fact that a lot of States already had outsourced this cloud computing for the election services and they were paying thousands of dollars for the service. And Amazon came in and in some of these States, South Carolina specifically, they said, we’ll charge you less than a hundred dollars a year.
Mike Papantonio: Okay.
Farron Cousins: To house this information.
Mike Papantonio: Talk about why that is. That’s the come on isn’t it?
Farron Cousins: Right, and there is no way Amazon’s profiting off of less than a hundred dollars a year. So there’s another reason.
Mike Papantonio: And what is it?
Farron Cousins: Well, I think it’s obvious. We know that Amazon doesn’t want anybody to come in and put regulations on them.
Mike Papantonio: Right.
Farron Cousins: We know that Amazon, you know, they’ve got an axe to grind with Bernie. They got an axe to grind with Donald Trump, and if they control the information, they absolutely could and I don’t want to sound conspiracy-ist here, but they could come in there.
Mike Papantonio: There’s, there’s nothing conspiracy about this.
Farron Cousins: Right.
Mike Papantonio: It’s about that and it’s about money.
Farron Cousins: Right.
Mike Papantonio: Okay. You control information, you control dollars. Obviously they lost huge money by saying to these entities, we’re only gonna charge $100. What are they really after? They’re after partial social security numbers. They’re after birth certificate, I mean, excuse me, date of births. They’re after all of this information that we don’t want out there and so all of a sudden they control all of that. They even have the signature. They have the, they, they have the duplicate of the signature, the handwritten signature that they have in the cloud and they can call on anytime. And who do they sell it to? They sell it to people who are marketing to us. That’s where the money comes in.
Farron Cousins: Yeah.
Mike Papantonio: The other part of the story, I think you hit it right on the head. When you control that kind of information, you’re powerful. You can threat, you can, you can pose a threat to your, to, to your enemies. And so I, I think this is where it’s going. As a matter of fact, you know, we see Google doing the same thing, don’t we?
Farron Cousins: Yeah.
Mike Papantonio: I mean, it’s the same thing. Gain information, control that information and you’re, you’re not only a political threat, but you’re in the business of making big money.
Farron Cousins: Well, and when you think about the fact that like the Capital One hack you mentioned, that was from somebody at AWS.
Mike Papantonio: Right.
Farron Cousins: So suppose you get an AWS employee that’s far left or far right, whatever it is, they want to screw with election results. They can do that now. And that’s what happens when you have this privatized entity.
Mike Papantonio: In, in Mexico, in Mexico right now they control the entire, the, for the entire country, they control the entire information on the voter database. That’s real scary stuff.
Mike Papantonio: In a landmark victory for marijuana reform, the House of Representatives has passed the secure fair enforcement banking act. While the debate over marijuana legalization has flooded state legislators, this banking bills passage could be paving the way for future federal reforms, we hope. Legal journalist Mollye Barrows joins us now to talk about that. Mollye, when, when was this bill introduced and does it seem to be moving at a decent rate?
Mollye Barrows: It does when, so little moves with bipartisan support in Congress now. This one really has a lot of support. So it was proposed in March and it’s moving right along. The House just passed it recently, in fact, and it was proposed by a Congressman out of Colorado and it’s basically a law, if it’s made law, it will protect any businesses that work with cannabis, it will enable them to be able to work safely with banking institutions and it will keep these banking institutions from being open to prosecution, any kind of criminal prosecution for doing business with them. Because, as you know, it’s still illegal federally, but we have 33 States and counting plus the district of Columbia that have legalized it for state use and individual use. So this is what it’s meant to do. There is so much money being made and basically Congress is saying, this isn’t about, or the House anyway, this isn’t about marijuana, this is about banking. And these banking institutions are asking for this. So let’s give it to them.
Mike Papantonio: Anytime, yeah, anytime you’re talk to Congress about banking or Wall Street, they’re always going to be favorable.
Mollye Barrows: Yes.
Mike Papantonio: Full disclosure, as I tell this story, I, I, Charlotte’s web is something that I, I want to a fair amount of. Okay. And so I wanna I want to tell you that the, the, the problem is when a state says we’re going to legalize this and then they don’t have anything that they can do with the money, they’re, everything’s cash.
Mollye Barrows: That’s right.
Mike Papantonio: Their credit cards are very, there’s some companies that have moved into that space, but it’s not broad enough. How has cannabis industry, how have they been operating without banking’s help?
Mollye Barrows: You said it, it’s a lot of cash. It’s individual niche businesses that help them problem solve, help them find, find financiers, if you will. Sometimes it’s overseas banks or institutions that are more comfortable with it. Sometimes it’s credit unions or local locally owned banks, state banks that aren’t underneath the same pressures or feeling the same constraints as maybe a national banking institution. So it’s more the individuals.
Mike Papantonio: I, I gotta tell this story because it’s…
Mollye Barrows: It’s exciting.
Mike Papantonio: To me it puts it in perspective. HSBC.
Mollye Barrows: Yes.
Mike Papantonio: We did this story.
Mollye Barrows: Yes.
Mike Papantonio: On them laundering money for terrorists. Okay. And they actually admitted it. Yes, we laundered money for terrorists and human life was taken. Americans were killed because of our laundering money for terrorists. Some, that’s an institution that says, ah, we can’t do this though. We certainly can’t get involved with marijuana. What’s your reaction to this? Isn’t this kind of the normal?
Mollye Barrows: Money, money and money.
Mike Papantonio: Yeah, yeah.
Mollye Barrows: I think they finally got support from the Republicans because Democrats have typically been on board with this. They typically have been supportive of marijuana as an alternative for medicinal treatment as well as a business, you know, proposition. And I think finally you’ve got the banking institution as a whole onboard with legalizing this because there’s so much money to be made and that’s where you’re getting the support from the Republicans. Because they are worried, again, going back to that far right stance of maybe offending some of their more conservative or religious constituents, if you will, who may see something wrong because it’s still illegal federally, but they want to move forward because they see a chance to make it about banking and not about marijuana.
Mike Papantonio: Okay.
Mollye Barrows: So that’s why it went through the House.
Mike Papantonio: Yeah. So, so where were these religious conservatives when HSBC raised their right hand and said, yes, we have taken in money from terrorists.
Mollye Barrows: That’s right.
Mike Papantonio: We knew what we were doing. We understood it was being used to kill American soldiers over in Iraq.
Mollye Barrows: Hypocritical.
Mike Papantonio: And we did it anyway, in Afghanistan. And it wasn’t just HSBC, by the way. So, okay, does this, let’s talk, let’s look at this. If it, if this bill passes, doesn’t it also create a trend where more States say, yeah, we’re comfortable legalizing this because the federal government finally has shown some leadership and said, banking can be involved.
Mollye Barrows: Yes, and I think there’s a lot that’s at stake here. I mean, first of all, we don’t know how well it’s going to do in the Senate, but so far reports indicate that they’re going to green light, that the, the, the fellow from Idaho who is in charge of the Senate banking committee, he said that he is definitely going to move it forward. Their version may not look exactly like the House’s version, but they do want to take it up. You have Marco Rubio saying, well, I may not agree with legalizing marijuana as a whole. I do agree with basically giving banks the green light to go ahead and control it financially, so that they have some control. So that to me seems to be the heart of it. Whether Rubio meant to say it or not, he was basically saying, we want to put our hands in that cookie jar. By golly, this is how we’re gonna do it.
Mike Papantonio: Yeah. Rubio’s all…
Mollye Barrows: And still feel god about ourselves, you know.
Mike Papantonio: Most, yeah still. Well, Rand Paul, what I love to see Rand Paul is libertarian, and he says, look, we’ll let’s, let’s, let’s own up to where this American culture is. Legalize marijuana is a reality.
Mollye Barrows: That’s right.
Mike Papantonio: At least for medical use, most people are going to go with that. It’s a, it’s, it’s reality. So let’s, let’s, let’s jump in and in own up to reality. Thank you for joining me.
Mollye Barrows: Yes.
Mike Papantonio: Okay.
Mollye Barrows: Thanks Pap.
Mike Papantonio: Yeah.